Table of Contents
I 'd include Toyota 2/3TC motor is someplace in the top 3 yet with those domestics you definitely have my leading 4 of all time for dependability. Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never had an engine concern. Rust is a different story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it simply appeared like a diesel.
I question how hard a swap it would be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time leaving it's own method ... the 300i6 would certainly do whatever I need this truck to do patgizz created: 3 things in the automotive world refuse to damage.
those must be held as the criteria to which everything else is determined. Almost whatever else fades in comparison. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based upon the chevy stovebolt 6 obviously) Wow, due to the outpour of praise, it looked good so I got it, here's the ad lmk what you guys believe Oops, didn't indicate to be cryptic, it slid my mind that the "5.0" was practically a 4.9 l.
Order of biz though, I'm relatively huge, and the guiding wheel to seat is fairly slim ... man that wheel cover was not ribbed for my enjoyment:-LRB- The only problem I have actually ever seen with vehicles like that, are broken shifters. Ford made them a little also hard and they would snap right at the floorboard.
Maintain in mind the gas mileage will not be the ideal worldwide, yet it will certainly damn sure run forever. Edit: I'm 6'2" and 280. I always had plenty of area in the taxicab of them. wbjones created: Brian composed: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never ever had an engine issue.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it simply seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 combined, 20 highway with the OD5. I ask yourself how hard a swap it would be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time leaving it's very own means ... The engine bay had not been designed for anything longer than a Mod motor. One canister remove an engine from a '97 style F-150 from the top, but it draws. Mod electric motors require to find out laterally and you have to draw the damper and water pump off of a 4.2. The core assistance does not unlock like in F250s and later F150s.
WonkoTheSane created: spitfirebill wrote: In respond to HappyAndy: Thanks Captain Obvious What did he claim to necessitate this? I'm really interested. I didn't see anything in his reply that would certainly require this reaction. "They are normally reliable as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine likes sludge? Knurled created: wbjones created: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 vehicle.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it just appeared like a diesel. I wonder just how hard a swap it would be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Really really cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek blog post, that I didn't make clear ... my bad In reply to spitfirebill: I included that point since when I needed to find a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I had to go with every one in every junkyard in South Jacket to discover one that wasn't sludged up truly severely.
Bernie: Which is a far better van, while we're going to discuss a couple of concerns of these vans, yet I I'm plainly not going to come out and claim one is far better than the various other. So if that's what you're looking for, you'll need to wait. Mark: So what are several of the distinctions between these two brand names? Bernie: Well, they're basically the same lorry.
Mark: So, well, let's start with engines after that. Let's speak regarding engine and really simply to specify that the model years, we're going to start from 2000 and up, you know, I imply, these vans have actually been around for a long time.
And, you know, for a version of a Chevy van has been around given that, you recognize, around that time too. Because 2000, I suggest, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s.
There's a great deal of concerns with these engines. In the earlier 2000 spark plugs with blow to these engines, because they didn't have adequate threading in the spark plug, which triggered troubles.
Extremely really cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek article, that I didn't explain ... my bad In reply to spitfirebill: I added that factor due to the fact that when I had to discover a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go through every one in every junkyard in South Jacket to discover one that wasn't sludged up really severely.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to talk concerning a couple of concerns of these vans, however I I'm clearly not going to come out and claim one is better than the other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the same vehicle.
Mark: So, well, allow's begin with engines after that. Allow's speak regarding engine and actually just to define that the version years, we're going to start from 2000 and up, you recognize, I indicate, these vans have actually been around for a long time.
And, you understand, for a variation of a Chevy van has actually been around because, you recognize, around that time as well. We're not going to get back right into, right into the earlier stuff. Considering that 2000, I mean, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are far more popular and I wouldn't truly recommend a V6 engine.
There's a lot of concerns with these engines. In the earlier 2000 trigger plugs with blow to these engines, because they didn't have sufficient threading in the stimulate plug, which triggered troubles.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealership near me Irving, Texas
Ford F150 dealer near me Irving
Ford F150 dealership